🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
Forums›COA & Analytical Testing›Has anyone dealt with are all coas created equal? mine looks different from others i see? › Page 4

Has anyone dealt with are all coas created equal? mine looks different from others i see?

mel_PDX Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 2:07 AM 31 replies 1,060 viewsPage 4 of 7
EndoResFellow
Member
456
2,345
Sep 2024
Baltimore, MD
Feb 9, 2026 at 9:46 AM#16

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik:

  • Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$128, 10-14 day turnaround
  • Valitech: US-based, ISO 17025 accredited, ~$248
  • Eurofins: Full pharmaceutical testing suite, more expensive but comprehensive
  • ChemTox: Basic identity and purity testing, ~$128

Janoshik is the community standard but any ISO-accredited analytical lab can verify peptide identity and purity. The key is independence — don't rely solely on the vendor's own testing.

15 13robert_kc, dan_philly, MeganSA_TX and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.PeteFamMed
Senior Member
2,012
9,234
Jan 2024
Minneapolis, MN
Feb 10, 2026 at 1:20 PM#17
HPLC_Greg said:
Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members.

This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.

Last edited: Feb 10, 2026 at 2:20 PM
16 14tommy_boulder, hyun_seoul, jim_asheville and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
KevinCompounds
VIP Member
5,432
18,234
Dec 2023
Nevada
Feb 11, 2026 at 4:53 PM#18

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed:

Main peak retention time: 14.2 minutes (consistent with semaglutide reference standard)
Peak purity: 99.3%
Related substances: 0.6% (single impurity at 8.1 minutes — likely a synthesis intermediate)
Mass spec: m/z 4113.58 (matches expected molecular weight)

This is a clean result. The mass spec confirmation is particularly important — it proves the molecule is actually semaglutide and not a substitution.

Last edited: Feb 11, 2026 at 6:53 PM
17 15MikeKY_noInsulin, Dr.RaviCardio, jennifer_SEA and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
anders_CPH
Senior Member
1,567
7,234
Feb 2024
Copenhagen, DK
Feb 12, 2026 at 8:26 PM#19
KevinCompounds said:
My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed: Main peak retention time:…

Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.

18 16BethLabQueen, ChrisMacros, KetoKyle and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
—
Online
Feb 13, 2026 at 11:58 PM#20

Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.

Last edited: Feb 14, 2026 at 3:58 AM
40 13PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register